Tag Archives: NAEEUK

China determined to fight air pollution

airpollution

During Expo, Shanghai skies became blue – proving change ‘is’ possible!

“Everyone breathing should act, said the State Council, which just hit the point of all environmental issues in China. ” China Daily 

 

The State Council, or China’s cabinet, adopted a set of concrete measures to counter air pollution on Friday, demonstrating not only resolve but also action to cope with environmental issues. CHINA DAILY reports

China’s leadership has repeatedly promised all-out efforts to conserve resources and curb pollution.

The key report at the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC) last November put promoting ecological progress as a long-term task of vital importance to the people’s wellbeing and China’s future.

At a study session with members of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee in late May, President Xi Jinping also pledged that China will not sacrifice the environment for temporary economic growth.

The State Council’s latest policies of reducing air pollution can be regarded as an implementation of the principles.

They also showed that the government has a clear understanding of the nature of environmental issues in China.

As the State Council statement said on Friday, reducing air pollution is about people’s welfare and the country’s economic future.

On one hand, smog is visible and affects the life of everyone, rich and poor. It has proven that environmental crises can stir controversy and greatly undermine social stability.

On the other hand, it is closely related to transforming the economic growth pattern and promoting urbanization, the two most important issues in government work.

The country’s biggest environmental issues are linked to its fast but extensive economic development.

There will be one answer to two questions if the country finds the way to realize an eco-friendly and sustainable growth.

Friday’s policies are largely about restraining energy-consuming and polluting industries, transforming energy structure and harsher punishment on polluters. But it also included efforts to enhance legislation, transparency of environmental information, government efficiency and coordination of governments at different levels.

These are as important as direct environmental policies, if not more important.

According to the State Council, provincial governments will be assessed on their performance in reducing air pollution, and smog will be considered a public emergency to which local governments have to respond.

Environmental issues need comprehensive efforts from all sectors, particularly local governments. Their initiative is the vital for implementing the policies and supervising enterprises. Friday’s policies urged them to act.

Everyone breathing should act, said the State Council, which just hit the point of all environmental issues in China.

Compiled by NAEEUK cochair Henricus Peters

International Children’s Day : Reconnecting children and nature

Today,  International Children’s Day, my particular goal is to enable children to reconnect with their environment …

Child

Background

 The World Conference for the Well-being of Children in Geneva, Switzerland, proclaimed June 1 to be International Children’s Day in 1925. It is usually marked with speeches on children’s rights and wellbeing, and other events involving or dedicated to children.

A similar event, Universal Children’s Day, falls on 20 November. It was established by the United Nations in 1954 and aims to promote the welfare of children around the world.

Groups that re-connect children with the outdoors and nature:

(click on the purple to visit websites)

 

NAEE (UK) – the National Association for Environmental Education

NAEElogosmall3

Children and Nature Network (USA) 

Creative Star (Scotland) https://twitter.com/creativestar

 

 

CURRICULUM REVIEW : Another letter to Michael Gove

English: Michael Gove speaking at the Conserva...

English: Michael Gove speaking at the Conservative Party “Big Society” policy launch (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Is the Government is trying to sideline ‘the environment’… ‘environmental education’ … education for sustainable development’ …? The National Curriculum Review currently underway is the chance for groups including NAEE (of which I am co-chair and Bill Scott is  President) to have say and – we hope – influence policy and positive change!

NAEElogosmall3

Letter to Michael Gove, Secretary of State for Education

Department for Education
Sanctuary Buildings

20 Great Smith Street

London
SW1P 3BT

Cc: Owen Paterson MP, Defra; David Heath MP, Defra; Joan Walley MP, EAC

16 April 2013

Dear Michael Gove
We are writing to urge you to keep sustainability in the National Curriculum objectives.  In 2000, the following values, aims and purposes were introduced:

“Pupils should develop awareness and understanding of, and respect for, the environments in which they live, and secure their commitment to sustainable development at a personal, national and global level.” (pg 11, https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/QCA-99-457.pdf)

This has allowed pioneer schools to create local whole school curricula that make core knowledge relevant and motivational. Schools embedding sustainability in their practice have been shown by Ofsted in many research reports to be Good or Excellent and with good links to improved achievement. But this practice is not yet across all schools.

Sustainability skills are commonly cited as needed by:

  1. Students (over 80% of 7-14 year olds want to learn more about global issues at school and rank this 3rd after numeracy and literacy – The Cooperative 2011 Ipsos Mori, quoted in their Sustainability Guide);
  2. University students (over 85% believe they need 8 sustainable development competencies in order to get jobs – HEA/NUS 2010, 2012),
  3. Teachers wanting to prepare their students for a sustainable future (see for example the Keep Britain Tidy Eco-Schools survey in 2013 where 92% wanted to keep sustainability in the curriculum, SEEd’s Teachers Needs Survey and baseline audits 2009, 2010, 2011)
  4. Businesses wanting both an understanding of, and skills for sustainability (many CSR reports and longer term sustainability strategies require these skills to underpin public commitments)

Keeping sustainability as an objective in the National Curriculum would allow many other schools to address topics that are part of sustainability without having to add more content to the pared down National Curriculum. This would reinforce the Department for Education’s endorsement of the Sustainable Schools Alliance, programmes such as Eco-Schools and other sustainable development initiatives in the Natural Environment White Paper 2011.

The ‘green economy’ has been growing in this country despite the recession; our students need the skills, innovation and creativity required for an environmentally, economically and socially better future.

The environment underpins our economy and society. Therefore we believe understanding this should be the entitlement for all children through retaining sustainability within the objectives of the national curriculum.

Yours Sincerely,

Ann Finlayson

Chief Executive Officer, SEEd

Phil Barton

Chief Executive Officer, Keep Britain Tidy

Richard Baker
Head of Education and Youth, Oxfam GB

Ruth Bond

Chair of the Federation of Women’s Institutes

Melanie Leech

Director General, Food and Drink Federation

David Palmer-Jones

Chief Executive Officer, Sita-UK part of Suez Environment

Craig Bennett

Policy Director, Friends of the Earth

Stewart Wallis

Executive Director, new economics foundation

Richard Wilkinson

Author of The Spirit Level

Daniel Crossley

Executive Director  – Food Ethics Council

Sam Fanshawe

Chief Executive, Marine Conservation Society

Finn Bolding Thomsen

Managing Director, Foundation for Environmental Education

Martin Roach

Creative Group Director, Epitype

Dr Diane Purchase

Principal Lecturer in Environmental Health/Biology, Middlesex University

 

Professor Sally Inman

Director Teacher Education for Equity and Sustainability UK Network (TEESNet)

Kat Thorne

Head of Sustainability, University of Greenwich

Stephen Sterling

Professor of Sustainability Education, University of Plymouth

Bill Scott

Emeritus Professor William Scott, University of Bath; President of NAEE: the National Association for Environmental Education

Dr Heather Barrett-Mold

Chair of Council, Institution of Environmental Sciences

Catrin Maby

Chief Executive, Severn Wye Energy Agency

Mike Tones

Chair of North East Environment Network (trading as Outdoor and Sustainability Education Specialists, OASES).

Rich Hurst

Lead for Sustainability Education, Durham County Council, Coordinator for North East Strategic Partnership for Sustainable Schools.

Sue Falch-Lovesey

Advisor, Norfolk Integrated Education Advisory Service, Norfolk County Council.

Iain Patton

Chief Executive, EAUC (Environmental Association for Universities and Colleges).

Matthew Spencer

Director, Green Alliance

Ed Gillespie,

Co-Founder, Futerra

Clare Flenly

Coordinator, Eco Active

Hugo Tagholm,

Executive Director, Surfers Against Sewage

John Eckersley

Managing Director

Gaeia – Global and Ethical Investment Advice

Pablo Guidi

Director

Liverpool World Centre

Tom Andrews

Chief Executive, People United.

Plans to drop climate debate from national curriculum ‘unacceptable’

English: Michael Gove speaking at the Conserva...

English: Michael Gove speaking at the Conservative Party “Big Society” policy launch (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Letter signed by academics, politicians and business leaders [ yesd even NAEEUK is there –  warns proposals are unfathomable and short-sighted. The Guardian reports

Leading environmental figures, including broadcaster Sir David Attenborough and mountaineer Sir Chris Bonington, have condemned government plans to drop debate about climate change from the national curriculum for children under 14 as “unfathomable and unacceptable”.

In a letter to the Sunday Times, also signed by academics, politicians and business leaders, they warn the proposals are short-sighted, coming at a time when the loss of wildlife and habitats is ongoing, and evidence suggests many children are missing out on the benefits of spending time in nature.

“Under the new draft national curriculum for England, education on the environment would start three years later than at present and all existing references to care and protection would be removed,” the letter states. “This is both unfathomable and unacceptable. Today’s children are tomorrow’s custodians of nature.

“There is a duty to ensure that all pupils have the chance to learn about threats to the natural world, to be inspired to care for it and to explore ways to preserve and restore it.

“These proposals not only undermine our children’s understanding and love of nature, but ultimately threaten nature itself.”

The letter, signed by 96 people, also including broadcasters Hugh Fearnley Whittingstall and Chris Packham, says the government has a commitment “to nurturing our children’s love and respect for nature” under two binding international agreements – the UN convention on the rights of the child and the convention on biological diversity’s Aichi targets.

Sir Chris BoningtonSir Chris Bonington has condemned the proposals. Photograph: Mark Pinder

The Guardian revealed last month that draft guidelines for children in key stages 1 to 3 had removed discussion of climate change in the geography syllabus, with only a single reference to how carbon dioxide produced by humans affects the climate in the chemistry section. All references to sustainable development have also been dropped in a move widely interpreted as the result of political interference.

The plans caused alarm among climate campaigners and scientists, with teachers and student groups also criticising the draft guidelines.

A 15-year-old girl started a petition to the education secretary, Michael Gove, to keep climate change in the national curriculum for under 14s, which has attracted more than 28,000 signatures.

Critics have pointed out that one of the dangers of waiting until GCSE courses to teach about climate change in any depth is that only a minority of pupils study geography at that level. The government’s former science adviser, Prof Sir David King, denounced the government proposals as “major political interference with the geography syllabus”.

The proposed changes have been broadly welcomed by some groups, including the Geographical Association, which represents more than 6,000 geography teachers, and the Royal Geographical Society, which said the guidelines provided for a better grounding in geography before students tackle climate change.

The Department for Education has dismissed the idea that climate change is being excised from the national curriculum, insisting “climate and weather feature throughout the geography curriculum”.

It is consulting on the proposed changes but the letter warns that “the place of the natural environment in the national curriculum is more critical than ever”.

WILDLIFE : International school project will track ospreys… but is the Government doing away with Nature?

Ospreys

Ospreys (Photo credit: DavidQuick)

Thousands of children from across Europe and Africa are to be brought together in a pioneering project to create a new generation of conservationists. Yet the Government is planning to reduce the importance placed on learning about the natural environment. The Independent reports. 

NAEE is very concerned about the environment being further extracted from the curriculum!

The osprey is being used to capture the attention of pupils. Satellite data showing the progress of the bird along its annual migration routes is being used in an interactive map which allows schools to follow the flights of birds tagged with GPS trackers.

Launched at ospreys.org.uk, it is the expansion of a pilot project in which several schools in Gambia – where the osprey spends the winter – have partnered with schools in England, where some breed each summer.

The pilot project began in 2011, but this year will involve schools from countries along the migration route, said Tim Mackrill, from Leicestershire and Rutland Wildlife Trust, which manages the “flyways” project. “This is the first project to enable schools to link up through the migration of this particular bird,” he said. Schools in Spain, Morocco, Finland, Ukraine, Italy and Estonia have already signed up.

Campaigners are fighting government proposals which would scrap references to children being required to be taught “to care for the environment”. They fear the move will undermine pupils’ understanding and appreciation of nature, according to the Wildlife Trusts. It is appealing for people to oppose the curriculum changes online at: education.gov.uk/consultations.

“It is very worrying if the Government is planning to reduce the importance placed on learning about the natural environment,” Mr Mackrill said.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 8,801 other followers

%d bloggers like this: