Uploaded on Sep 8, 2011
An animated cartoon showing how fossils are formed – created by Woodroffe School
@NAEE_UK believes children should learn about the marine environment
The fate of one of the hotspots of global diversity is hanging by a thread as conservation and indigenous groups in Ecuador race to raise a petition of over half a million names which would force a national referendum on whether foreign oil companies be allowed into the Yasuní national park.
President Rafael Correa of Ecuador appeared to sign the death warrant of the park last week when he unilaterally dissolved a radical conservation plan which guaranteed that the 840m barrels of oil thought to lie below one area of the park would remain unexploited if the international community raised $3.6bn (£2.3bn) over 13 years. Although $336m had been pledged by governments, local authorities, charities and individuals around the world, only $13m is said to have been deposited in the two trust funds administered by the UN.
Correa’s decision to allow oil companies to drill below one of the most biodiverse places on the planet, where at least one tribe lives in voluntary isolation, was met by demonstrations in Quito and condemnation by international conservation organisations.
The only chance of stopping the companies now is to raise a petition of 5% of the country’s 10m voters to force a referendum. If the names can be collected, Correa is likely to be defeated because recent polls suggest a large majority of Ecuadoreans remain in favour of the Yasuní-ITT initiative. This week marches were being planned in cities including Quito, Machala, Cuenca, Puyo and Guayaquil.
“The government doesn’t have the right to dissolve the Yasuní-ITT initiative because this doesn’t belong to them,” said Esperanza Martinez, the president of the Acción Ecológica environmental group, which is part of the coalition. “The initiative was a proposal that came from civil society.”
Correa has gone on the offensive, accusing ecologists and his critics of being naive, and saying poverty destroys nature faster than the oil industry. “The real dilemma is this: do we protect 100% of the Yasuní and have no resources to meet the urgent needs of our people, or do we save 99% of it and have $18bn to defeat poverty?” he said. “There are groups that are politicising the Yasuní-ITT issue to finally ‘beat’ the government, and especially to manipulate young folk.”
He raised the stakes by threatening to force newspapers to go entirely digital. In a series of tweets he said that if the necessary signatures were gathered and there was a referendum, he would propose that newspapers be published in digital format only “to save paper and avoid so much indiscriminate cutting of trees.”
Environment minister Lorena Tapia promised minimal environmental impact if the oil companies went in. “The park will stay as it is, as much as the government can do. We will use the best technology and the strictest control,” she said.
But conservationists said oil would inevitably lead to destruction, not just from pollution of waterways and industry infrastructure, but from tens of thousands of people flooding in to the area in search of land and work, as they have done everywhere else in Ecuador where oil has been exploited. The area north of the Tapo river, just a few miles from Yasuní, was exploited in the 70s and is now a heavily populated, highly polluted area of towns, farms and with little original forest left.
“The greatest fear is that roads will be biuilt and people will enter the park. If that happens Yasuní could be like other oilfield areas in Ecuador. Correa says the bulldozers could be starting work within weeks,” said Kelly Swing, professor of environmental science at the Universidad San Francisco de Quito and director of the Tiputini research station on the edge of the Yasuní park.
Hollywood stars this week joined international conservationists. Actor Leonardo di Caprio, in a series of tweets, said: “Sad day, but fight is not over. Correa abandoned Yasuní, but people of Ecuador have not.”
Leading environmenatal activists accused Correa of “failing the world”. Nnimmo Bassey, drector of Environmental rights action in Nigeria and former chair of Friends of the Earth International, said: “Life is more valuable than crude oil. No-one can buy the planet and all she has to offer. All who value the planet, no matter where we are located, must defend Yasuní. The Ecuadorian constitution recognizes the right of nature. Let us tell President Correa that opening up Yasuní ITT to the claws of the oil predators is a blatant abuse of nature and her rights.”
He added: “Now, the only hope that remains is the reaction from the people of Ecuador. This act brings to the fore the critical struggle that we must wage around the world to ensure that elected officials do not usurp our sovereignty after being sworn into office. And the protests that greeted the announcement is a sign that the people of Ecuador are clear about the fact that the decision to allow the assault on Yasuní is not with the consent of the people.”
Uncertainty surrounds the money that has already been contributed. The Ecuadorian government created both an international and a national trust which together collected about $13m. According to one source in government, deposits below $ 50,000 will not be returned.
Correa’s abandonment of the Yasuní initiative is a blow to both global climate change and biodiversity. It is estimated that protection of the park would have avoided 407m metric tons of CO2 emissions and 800m metric tons of CO2 from avoided deforestation.
Myself and Rose were invited by the Chilterns Common’s Project to Ashampstead and BuckleburyCommons both situated in the beautiful county of Berkshire, north of the M4 motorway.
Our host, Dick Greenway has lived in his lovely cottage on the edge of Ashampstead for 42 years. I can understand why. The cottage is believed to be from the 15th century and set in stunning countryside, and completely off the beaten track. I would certainly move in there tomorrow, well if Dick wanted to sell and I’d won the lottery!
Ashampstead and burnt hill common are about 80 hectares in size. The soils range from infertile acid Berkamstead Series to calcareous Icknield Series. There is also a surface of chalk throughout. In the mid 13th century it is believed the Commons were pasture woodland which were enclosed by the lord of the manor to form a deer park.
After a much needed cup of tea we…
View original post 336 more words
An interesting post from English Heritage : Built Environment !
A new report demonstrates that embracing historic character makes for a popular high street, Tim Brennan, our Senior Regeneration Advisor, discusses how councils can identify and embrace historic character to sensitively sow the seeds of a successful development scheme.
Almost everyone will be familiar with the issues currently facing retailers and those involved in managing our high streets – the success of out of town shopping and the growth of online retailing has had very obvious effects on the health of many town and city centres. Add in the effects of the recession and the financial pressures on local authorities and we have a situation where many high streets are characterised by both a lack of shoppers and increasing numbers of vacant shops.
The debate about how to address these issues has become increasingly high profile in recent months, with various initiatives including the efforts of retail guru Mary Portas making…
View original post 562 more words
From The Independent
The power, reach and influence of the Central Intelligence Agency is a staple of conspiracy theories.
The news that the CIA is reportedly part-funding a scientific geoengineering study into how to control the weather is unlikely to dampen speculation over their activities.
According to US website ‘Mother Jones’ the CIA is helping fund a study by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) that will investigate whether humans could use geoengineering – which is defined as deliberate and large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climatic system – to stop climate change.
The NAS website describes the study as an investigation into “a limited number of proposed geoengineering techniques, including examples of both solar radiation management (SRM) and carbon dioxide removal (CDR) techniques.”
The purpose of this is to comment “generally on the potential impacts of deploying these technologies, including possible environmental, economic, and national security concerns”, the website claims.
Solar radiation management (SRM) is a theoretical branch of geoengineering which moots the idea of reflecting sunlight in an attempt to block infrared radiation and halt rising temperatures.
The cost of the project is reported to be $630,000, which NAS is splitting with the CIA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and NASA reports say.
A reference on the NAS website to “the US intelligence community” funding the project refers to the CIA, an NAS spokesman claimed.
Much speculation has surrounded claims that the US government has long been involved in types of weather manipulation, including a much-discussed attempt to cloud-seed – the process of dispersing substances into the air to create cloud condensation or ice nuclei and subsequently rain or snow – during the Vietnam war.
It was also widely reported that the Chinese government seeded clouds ahead of the 2008 Olympics opening ceremony to create a downpour elsewhere and keep the stadium dry by firing iodide crystals into rain clouds over Beijing.
Weather manipulation was most recently in the news after claims by some American commentators that devastating tornadoes in Oklahoma, along with other extreme weather events like Hurricane Sandy, were created by the US government using the Haarp antenna farm in Alaska.
A CIA spokesman refused to comment on the NAS study but told Mother Jones: “It’s natural that on a subject like climate change the Agency would work with scientists to better understand the phenomenon and its implications on national security.”